This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Overview Research Site Status and Provenance Access and Downloads
Name of Research Project
Related Project
Part
FORMBLOOM: FORMBLOOM: Forecasting Tools and Mitigation Options for Diverse Bloom-Affected Lakes
Work Program 1: Risk Communication
Dataset Title
Mixed Method Investigation of Effectiveness of Risk Communications for Algal Blooms in Canada
Additional Information
GeoNetwork record: www.gwfnet.net/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/9fd39546-2ef6-4065-82c6-46e0b9f1c550
Creators and Contributors
NameRoleEmailInstitution
Lori Bradford
Point of Contact, Principal Investigator
lori.bradford@usask.ca
University of Saskatchewan
Lalita Bharadwaj
Principal Investigator
University of Saskatchewan
Hamid Rashidi
Research Associate
University of Saskatchewan
Arshdeep Gill
Graduate Student
University of Saskatchewan
Naveeta Ramkissoon
Graduate Student
University of Saskatchewan
Myron Neapetung
Collaborator
Yellow Quill First Nation
Justin Burns
Collaborator
James Smith Cree Nation
Abstract
This dataset includes:
- Environmental scan (as per Albright 2004) of bloom risk communication strategies by province
- Semi-structured interviews with government agents responsible for bloom monitoring and communication
- Database and systematic review of academic and grey literature (as per Cochrane protocol) for best practices of bloom risk communication
- Survey of public with experience of blooms to determine risk communications effectiveness in Prairies
Purpose
While tools to manage harmful bloom risk for drinking waters, and recreational waters exist in Canada, they are unevenly applied and may be poorly coordinated due to splits in agency responsibilities for overall water quality, drinking water, and health. Similar problems exist in the US, and across developed and developing nations. Many regions lack technical and financial capacity to develop formal monitoring and risk management programs. Saskatchewan, for example, follows the Canadian drinking water quality guidelines for microcystin in treated municipal drinking water and recreational water supplies, but has no formal management plan. Generally, sampling occurs and advisories are issued based on the presence of a bloom (from a visual inspection) and identification of cyanobacteria in samples. Identification of a guideline exceedance may be too late for management and communication to prevent risks of exposure to cyanobacteria and their toxins, and communications channels could be improved among agencies aware of, but with differing responsibilities for blooms. Reactive management strategies relying on monitoring alone are clearly not sufficient for protecting the health of water users. Water users vary in their response to risk messaging based on factors that include geography, age, and social factors. As a result, risk amplification or underestimation of true risk may occur.
Plain Language Summary
Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) are a growing problem in much of the world. The impacts and risks associated with blooms, however, vary across states and nation, as do the strategies and protocols to assess, monitor, and manage their occurrence. While guidelines for water quality have been standardized nationally, responses to HABs are not. We explore strategies and protocols with the goal of understanding how to communicate risks associated with HABs to the public, through the inclusion of public perceptions of risk communications on HABs. An environmental scan was conducted on provincial and territorial government agency protocols around HABs, as well as interviews with managers responsible for HABs monitoring and messaging, surveys with members of the public in the Prairies, and a systematic review of HABs risk communication recommendations. Results suggest that there are variations in the monitoring, managing, and communicating of risk to the public. British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and Quebec have well-established inter-agency protocols, while others follow federal guidelines. Notably, three northern territories have no protocols in place. Variations are found in monitoring, where some provinces perform regular monitoring of recreational waterbodies and others monitor on a case-by-case basis. British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Quebec use a variety of information venues (online, social media, postings, radio) to communicate risks associated with HABs, whereas others’ communications are limited. Collaboration between federal, provincial, and Indigenous communities, and agencies and authorities needs to be a priority as it aligns provincial responses and meets the comprehensive and consistent standards needed to communicate about HABs. Although standardization of protocols for HABs monitoring and communication may lead to better health risk prevention, it is not necessarily feasible in some regions given the natural variation of HABs and jurisdictional challenges.
Keywords
Keyword
risk communications
harmful algae blooms
environmental management
cross-cultural communication
risk messaging
survey
Temporal Extent
Begin Date
End Date
2018-04-02
2020-09-30
Is Boundary Rectangular
○ Yes
◉ No
Specific Locations (if needed)
Description of Specific LocationLatitudeLongitude
James Smith Cree Nation
53.1348
-104.8693
Yellow Quill First Nation
52.354
-103.662
Status of data collection/production
○ Planned
○ In Progress
○ Abandoned
◉ Complete
Dataset Completion or Abandonment Date
2020-09-30
Data Update Frequency
○ Continually
○ Daily
○ Weekly
○ Biweekly
○ Monthly
○ Anually
○ As needed
○ Irregular
◉ None planned
○ Unknown
Primary Source of Data
◻ Unknown/Unspecified
◻ Census
◻ Field collected samples
◻ Field experiment
◻ Field observation
▣ Field survey
◻ Human biological samples
◻ Lab experiment
◻ Model simulation
◻ Previously collected
▣ Qualitative (from observations or interviews)
▣ Social survey
▣ Traditional knowledge
▣ Other Source of Data (Please specify in field below)
Other Source of Data (if applicable)
systematic review of literature
Does the data have access restrictions?
◻ No restriction (data is currently open to public)
▣ Limited (data is currently under embargo until publication)
▣ Limited (data involves intellectual property issues related to local or traditional knowledge)
◻ Limited (release of data may cause harm to the environment or to the public)
▣ Limited (pre-existing data has been used and is subject to access restrictions)
▣ Limited (data involves human subjects)
◻ Limited (data is supported by industry partnerships)
◻ Limited (data is supported by government partnerships)
File formats and online databases
◻ Link to online database or web services (e.g., WISKI, ECCC)
◻ Archive files (.zip, .rar, .7z, .tar, .tgz, .tar.gz, etc.)
▣ CSV files (.csv - comma or tab separated value files)
◻ Excel document files (.xlsx, .xls)
◻ Image files (e.g., .tiff, .jpeg, .png, .gif, etc.)
◻ NetCDF files (.netcdf, .nc)
▣ Text files (.txt)
◻ Word document files (.docx, .doc)
◻ Other (Please specify in field below)
List of Parameters and Variables
Parameter/VariableUnitFrequencySource
Survey: Gender, Age, Indigenous status, Place_of_Residence
Survey modified likert
Every survey
Paper-based or online survey
In which lakes or waterways have you experienced algal blooms?
Open ended responses
Every survey
Paper-based or online survey
What kind of signage have you noticed for algal blooms - probes – have you seen posters, warnings through news-media, websites or others
Open ended responses
Every survey
Paper-based or online survey
When you have experienced an algal bloom, what did you do
Open ended responses
Every survey
Paper-based or online survey
How would you like to find out more about algal bloom risks and events
Open ended responses
Every survey
Paper-based or online survey
Interview data were derived from semi-structured interviews with 11 managers in the Prairies about practices for HABs risk communications
Open ended qualitative data
Unique to each participant
Recordings of interviews plus verified transcripts
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-08-10
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2020-12-01-H1FPKFH1uKH2EuMMSXy3hgxAQ Dataset 1.2