This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Ho, E., Trant, A. J., Gray, M. A., & Courtenay, S. C.
Title
Comparison of freshwater monitoring approaches: strengths, opportunities, and recommendations
Year
2020
Publication Outlet
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(9), 1-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08570-1
Citation
Ho, E., Trant, A. J., Gray, M. A., & Courtenay, S. C. (2020). Comparison of freshwater monitoring approaches: strengths, opportunities, and recommendations. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(9), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08570-1
Abstract
This review identifies strengths and weaknesses of water monitoring programs selected by Canadian water managers. We used 22 criteria, guided by outcomes of an exploratory study and supported by 21 semi-structured key informant interviews. The highest-scoring programs include the Slave Watershed Environmental Effects Program (Canada), the Government of Canada’s Environmental Effects Monitoring Program, and Healthy Land and Water (Australia). We describe five recommendations for improving future freshwater monitoring frameworks: (1) recognize different knowledge approaches (especially Indigenous), (2) use multiple reporting formats, (3) clarify monitoring and management roles, (4) apply a whole-watershed approach, and (5) link monitoring to management and decision-making.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-LF: Lake Futures
Publication Stage
Published
Additional Information
Lake Futures
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08570-1
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-07-24
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2021-11-14-61Xj84YXhYkS3UrZM2j3IDg Publication 1.0