https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.029

Chik, A. H., Glier, M. B., Servos, M., Mangat, C. S., Pang, X. L., Qiu, Y., D'Aoust, P.M., Burnet, J. B., Delatolla, R., Dorner, S., Geng, Q., & CoV-2 Inter-Laboratory Consortium. (2021). Comparison of approaches to quantify SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using RT-qPCR: Results and implications from a collaborative inter-laboratory study in Canada. journal of environmental sciences, 107, 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.029

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater is a promising tool for informing public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, approaches for its analysis by use of reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) are still far from standardized globally. To characterize inter- and intra-laboratory variability among results when using various methods deployed across Canada, aliquots from a real wastewater sample were spiked with surrogates of SARS-CoV-2 (gamma-radiation inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and human coronavirus strain 229E [HCoV-229E]) at low and high levels then provided “blind” to eight laboratories. Concentration estimates reported by individual laboratories were consistently within a 1.0-log10 range for aliquots of the same spiked condition. All laboratories distinguished between low- and high-spikes for both surrogates. As expected, greater variability was observed in the results amongst laboratories than within individual laboratories, but SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration estimates for each spiked condition remained mostly within 1.0-log10 ranges. The no-spike wastewater aliquots provided yielded non-detects or trace levels (<20 gene copies/mL) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Detections appear linked to methods that included or focused on the solids fraction of the wastewater matrix and might represent in-situ SARS-CoV-2 to the wastewater sample. HCoV-229E RNA was not detected in the no-spike aliquots. Overall, all methods yielded comparable results at the conditions tested. Partitioning behavior of SARS-CoV-2 and spiked surrogates in wastewater should be considered to evaluate method effectiveness. A consistent method and laboratory to explore wastewater SARS-CoV-2 temporal trends for a given system, with appropriate quality control protocols and documented in adequate detail should succeed.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.029
PDF available at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074221000346/pdfft?md5=84f609d7cd11c66a519bcf5864614927&pid=1-s2.0-S1001074221000346-main.pdf

CHIK-A-H-GLIER-M-B-SERVOS-M-MANGAT-C-S-PANG-X-L-QIU-Y-DAOUST-PM-BURNET-J-B-DELATOLLA-R-DORNER-S-GENG-Q-COV-2-INTER-LABORATORY-CONSORTIUM-2021-COMPARISON-OF-APPROACHES-TO-QUANTIFY-SARS-COV-2-IN-WASTEWATER-USING-RT-QPCR-RESULTS-AND-IMPLICATIONS-FROM-A-COLLABORATIVE-INTER-LABORATORY-STUDY-IN-CANADA-JOURNAL-OF-ENVIRONMENTAL-SCIENCES-107-218-229-HTTPSDOIORG101016JJES202101029-