This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information
Publication Type
Conference Presentation
Authorship
Xie Yuwei, Ankley Phillip J., Graves Stephanie, Challis Jonathan K., Servos Mark R., Giesy John P.
Title
A passive eDNA sampling strategy for metazoan biodiversity assessment
Year
2022
Publication Outlet
AOSM2022
Citation
Yuwei Xie, Phillip J. Ankley, Stephanie Graves, Jonathan K. Challis, Mark R. Servos, John P. Giesy (2022). A passive eDNA sampling strategy for metazoan biodiversity assessment. Proceedings of the GWF Annual Open Science Meeting, May 16-18, 2022.
Abstract
To understand the dynamic freshwater ecosystems, bio-survey relies on periodic active field sampling. Aqueous environmental DNA (aeDNA) snapshots biodiversity information typically from the contemporary environment, which may underestimate the bio-integrity. Additionally, water filtration is time-consuming and labour-intensive, and can have high risk of external contamination. Here, we tested passive eDNA sampling approach in a boreal lake to assess the ability of this sampling method for aeDNA metabarcoding-based biomonitoring. The collection methods used included swab and gel passive sampling along with water and sediment samples, with all four methods being compared to each other for the detection of target taxa and to traditional biomonitoring or historical data. The target taxa to compare between collection methods included zooplankton, fish, and benthic macroinvertebrates, as these taxa had traditional biomonitoring data available for the study lake and represent taxa that are most commonly used for biomonitoring purposes. Cytochrome Oxidase I (CO1) gene region was utilized for metazoan metabarcoding, as there are large databases readily accessible with CO1 annotated species and it performs well for metazoan biodiversity. Passive samplers, polyacrylamide diffusive gel and smaller ecological footprint and non-hazardous swab, improves sensitivity of aeDNA metabarcoding to characterize metazoan biodiversity and detection of target taxa through metabarcoding.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-NGS: Next Generation Solutions for Healthy Water Resources
Submitters
NameRoleEmailInstitution
Yuwei Xie
Submitter/Presenter
yuwei.xie@usask.ca
University of Saskatchewan
Publication Stage
N/A
Theme
Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystems
Presentation Format
10-minute oral presentation
Additional Information
AOSM2022 Next generation solutions to ensure healthy water resources for future generations First Author: Yuwei Xie, Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada Additional Authors: Phillip J. Ankley, Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Stephanie Graves, Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Biology Department, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Jonathan K. Challis, Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Lethbridge, AB, Canada; Mark R. Servos, Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo. Ontario, Canada; John P. Giesy, Toxicology Centre and Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada;Department of Environmental Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA; Department of Zoology and Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-08-10
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2022-04-24-n173WcsZqTkuqTZcVg6n2yn3Q Publication 1.0