This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Nerantzaki, S. D., & Papalexiou, S. M.
Title
Assessing extremes in hydroclimatology: A review on probabilistic methods
Year
2022
Publication Outlet
Journal of Hydrology, 605, 127302
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127302
Citation
Nerantzaki, S. D., & Papalexiou, S. M. (2022). Assessing extremes in hydroclimatology: A review on probabilistic methods. Journal of Hydrology, 605, 127302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127302
Abstract
Here we review methods used for probabilistic analysis of extreme events in Hydroclimatology. We focus on streamflow, precipitation, and temperature extremes at regional and global scales. The review has four thematic sections: (1) probability distributions used to describe hydroclimatic extremes, (2) comparative studies of parameter estimation methods, (3) non-stationarity approaches, and (4) model selection tools. Synthesis of the literature shows that: (1) recent studies, in general, agree that precipitation and streamflow extremes should be described by heavy-tailed distributions, (2) the Method of Moments (MOM) is typically the first choice in estimating distribution parameters but it is outperformed by methods such as L-Moments (LM), Maximum Likelihood (ML), Least Squares (LS), and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (BMCMC), (3) there are less popular parameter estimation techniques such as the Maximum Product of Spacings (MPS), the Elemental Percentile (EP), and the Minimum Density Power Divergence Estimator (MDPDE) that have shown competitive performance in fitting extreme value distributions, and (4) non-stationary analyses of extreme events are gaining popularity; the ML is the typically used method, yet literature suggests that the Generalized Maximum Likelihood (GML) and the Weighted Least Squares (WLS) may be better alternatives. The review offers a synthesis of past and contemporary methods used in the analysis of hydroclimatic extremes, aiming to highlight their strengths and weaknesses. Finally, the comparative studies summary helps the reader identify the most suitable modeling framework for their analyses, based on the extreme hydroclimatic variables, sample sizes, locations, and evaluation metrics reviewed.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Publication Stage
Published
Additional Information
Papalexiou, Simon-Michael , Refereed Publications
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127302
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-08-10
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2022-12-03-91M2WdDFNx0qSQqVEteddMQ Publication 1.0