This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
De Haan, K., Khomik, M., Kessel, E., Green, A., Helgason, W., Macrae, M.L. and Petrone, R.M.
Title
Assessment of different water use efficiency calculations for dominant forage crops in the Great Lakes basin
Year
2021
Publication Outlet
Agriculture, 11(8), 739
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080739
Citation
De Haan, K., Khomik, M., Kessel, E., Green, A., Helgason, W., Macrae, M.L. and Petrone, R.M.: Assessment of different water use efficiency calculations for dominant forage crops in the Great Lakes basin, Agriculture, 11(8), 739, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080739 , 2021
Abstract
Water use efficiency (WUE) can be calculated using a range of methods differing in carbon uptake and water use variable selection. Consequently, inconsistencies arise between WUE calculations due to complex physical and physiological interactions. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare WUE estimates (harvest or flux-based) for alfalfa (C3 plant) and maize (C4 plant) and determine effects of input variables, plant physiology and farming practices on estimates. Four WUE calculations were investigated: two “harvest-based” methods, using above ground carbon content and either precipitation or evapotranspiration (ET), and two “flux-based” methods, using gross primary productivity (GPP) and either ET or transpiration. WUE estimates differed based on method used at both half-hourly and seasonal scales. Input variables used in calculations affected WUE estimates, and plant physiology led to different responses in carbon assimilation and water use variables. WUE estimates were also impacted by different plant physiological responses and processing methods, even when the same carbon assimilation and water use variables were considered. This study highlights a need to develop a metric of measuring cropland carbon-water coupling that accounts for all water use components, plant carbon responses, and biomass production.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-AWF: Agricultural Water Futures
Publication Stage
Published
Additional Information
AWF, Refereed Publications
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080739
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-07-24
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2022-12-03-P1jMh81wG8UG6pgDbfl4VEQ Publication 1.0