This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Sabur, M.A., Parsons, C.T., Maavara, T., and Van Cappellen, P.
Title
Effects of pH and dissolved silicate on phosphate mineral-water partitioning with geothite
Year
2022
Publication Outlet
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 6, 34-43
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00197
Citation
Sabur, M.A., Parsons, C.T., Maavara, T., and Van Cappellen, P. (2022). Effects of pH and dissolved silicate on phosphate mineral-water partitioning with geothite. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 6, 34-43, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00197
Abstract
Release of sorbed phosphate from ferric iron oxyhydroxides can contribute to excessive algal growth in surface water bodies. Dissolved silicate has been hypothesized to facilitate phosphate desorption by competing for mineral surface sites. Here, we conducted phosphate and silicate adsorption experiments with goethite under a wide pH range (3–11), both individually (P or Si) and simultaneously (P plus Si). The entire experimental data set was successfully reproduced by the charge distribution multisite surface complexation (CD-MUSIC) model. Phosphate adsorption was highest under acidic conditions and gradually decreased from near-neutral to alkaline pH conditions. Maximum silicate adsorption, in contrast, occurred under alkaline conditions, peaking around pH 10. The competitive effect of silicate on phosphate adsorption was negligible under acidic conditions, becoming more pronounced under alkaline conditions and elevated molar Si:P ratios (>4). In a subsequent experiment, desorption of phosphate with increasing pH was monitored, in the presence or absence of dissolved silicate. While, as expected, desorption of phosphate was observed during the transition from acidic to alkaline conditions, a fraction of phosphate remained irreversibly bound to goethite. Even at high Si:P ratios and alkaline pH, dissolved silicate did not affect phosphate desorption, implying that kinetic factors prevented silicate from displacing phosphate from goethite binding sites.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-LF: Lake Futures
Publication Stage
N/A
Additional Information
Lake Futures, PUBLICATIONS and ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00197
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-07-08
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2023-01-04-q1q2Vq3sAekCUWIy3wNtg5xpQ Publication 1.0