This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Abdelhamed, M. S., Elshamy, M. E., Razavi, S., & Wheater, H. S.
Title
The Ability of Hydrologic-Land Surface Models to Concurrently Simulate Permafrost and Hydrology
Year
2023
Publication Outlet
The Cryosphere Discussions, 2023, 1-41
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-20
Citation
Abdelhamed, M. S., Elshamy, M. E., Razavi, S., & Wheater, H. S. (2023). The Ability of Hydrologic-Land Surface Models to Concurrently Simulate Permafrost and Hydrology. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2023, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-20
Abstract
Hydrologic-land surface models (H-LSMs) provide physically-based understanding and predictions of the current and future states of the world’s vast high-latitude permafrost regions. Two major challenges, however, hamper their parametrization and validation when concurrently representing hydrology and permafrost. One is the high computational complexity, exacerbated by the need to include a deep soil profile to adequately capture the freeze/thaw cycles and heat storage. The other is that soil-temperature data are severely limited, and traditional model validation, based on streamflow, can show the right fit to these data for the wrong reasons. There are few observational sites for such vast, heterogeneous regions, and remote sensing provides only limited support. In light of these challenges, we develop 16 parametrizations of a Canadian H-LSM, MESH, for the sub-arctic Liard River Basin and validate them using three data sources: streamflows at multiple gauges, soil temperature profiles from few available boreholes, and multiple permafrost maps. The different parametrizations favor different sources of data and it is challenging to configure a model faithful to all three data sources, which are at times inconsistent with each other. Overall, the results show that: (1) surface insulation through snow cover primarily regulates permafrost dynamics after model initialization effects decay over, relatively long time and (2) different parametrizations yield different partitioning patterns of solid-vs-liquid soil-water and produce different low-flow but similar high-flow regimes. We conclude that, given data scarcity, an ensemble of model parametrizations is essential to provide a reliable picture of the current states and future spatio-temporal co-evolution of permafrost and hydrology.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-IMPC: Integrated Modelling Program for Canada
Publication Stage
Published
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-20
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-07-08
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2024-02-27-R1KqPfuU8xESre8vj48OR3ow Publication 1.0