This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Mohammadlou, M., Bahremand, A., Princz, D., Kinar, N., Haghnegahdar, A., Razavi, S.
Title
Objective evaluation of the Global Environmental Multiscale Model (GEM) with precipitation and temperature for Iran
Year
2022
Publication Outlet
Natural Resource Modeling, 35(3), e12343
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12343
Citation
Mohammadlou, M., Bahremand, A., Princz, D., Kinar, N., Haghnegahdar, A., Razavi, S. (2022) Objective evaluation of the Global Environmental Multiscale Model (GEM) with precipitation and temperature for Iran. Natural Resource Modeling, 35(3), e12343. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12343
Abstract
The Global Environmental Multiscale Model (GEM) is currently in operational use for data assimilation and forecasting at 25–15 km scales; regional 10 km scales over North America; and 2.5 km scales over Canada. To evaluate the GEM model for forecasting applications in Iran, global daily temperature and precipitation outputs of GEM at a 25 km scale were compared to data sets from hydrometeorological stations and the De Martonne climate classification method was used to demarcate climate zones for comparisons. GEM model outputs were compared to observations in each of these zones. The results show good agreement between GEM outputs and measured daily temperatures with Kling-Gupta efficiencies of 0.76 for the arid, 0.71 for the semiarid, and 0.78 for the humid regions. There is also an agreement between GEM outputs and measured annual precipitation with differences of 50% for the arid, 36% for the semiarid, and 15% for the humid region. There is a ~13% systematic difference between the elevation of stations and the average elevation of corresponding GEM grid cells; differences in elevation associated with forcing data sets can be potentially corrected using environmental lapse rates. Compared with hydrometeorological data sets, the GEM model precipitation outputs are less accurate than temperature outputs, and this may influence the accuracy of potential Iranian forecasting operations utilizing GEM. The results of this study provide an understanding of the operation and limitations of the GEM model for climate change and hydro-climatological studies.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-IMPC: Integrated Modelling Program for Canada
Publication Stage
Published
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12343
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-08-21
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2024-02-27-o14tVpvmwbkSlZbpPo2xvTrA Publication 1.0