Modeling multi-year phosphorus dynamics in a bioretention cell: phosphorus partitioning, accumulation, and export
Section 1: Overview
Name of Research Project
Program Affiliations
Related Research Project(s)
GWF-Managing Urban Eutrophication Risks under Climate Change: An Integrated Modelling and Decision Support Framework | |
Dataset Title
Modeling multi-year phosphorus dynamics in a bioretention cell: phosphorus partitioning, accumulation, and export
Additional Information
Creators and Contributors
Zhou, B. | Principal Investigator | | University of Waterloo |
Shafii, M. | Co-Author | | University of Waterloo |
Parsons, C. | Co-Author | | Environment and Climate Change Canada |
Passeport, E. | Co-Author | | University of Toronto |
Rezanezhad, F. | Co-Author | | University of Waterloo |
Lisogorsky, A. | Co-Author | | University of Waterloo |
Van Cappellen, P. | Co-Author | | University of Waterloo |
Abstract
Abstract: Nutrient phosphorus (P) export from urban areas via stormwater runoff contributes to eutrophication of downstream aquatic ecosystems. Bioretention cells are a Low Impact Development (LID) technology promoted as a green solution to attenuate urban peak flow discharge, as well as the export of excess nutrients and other contaminants. Despite their rapidly growing implementation worldwide, a predictive understanding of the efficiency of bioretention cells in reducing P runoff remains limited. Here, we present a reaction-transport model data and codes that was used to simulate the fate and transport of P in a bioretention cell facility in the greater Toronto metropolitan area. The model incorporates a representation of the biogeochemical reaction network that controls P cycling within the cell. We used the model as a diagnostic tool to determine the relative importance of processes immobilizing P in the bioretention cell. The model predictions were compared to multi-year observational data on 1) the outflow loads of total P (TP) and soluble reactive P (SRP) during the 2012-2017 period, 2) TP depth profiles collected at 4 time points during the 2012-2019 period, and 3) sequential chemical P extractions performed on core samples from the filter media layer obtained in 2019. According to the modeling results, groundwater recharge was principally responsible for decreasing the surface water discharge from the bioretention cell (63% runoff reduction). From 2012 to 2017, the cumulative outflow export loads of TP and SRP only accounted for 1% and 2% of the corresponding inflow loads, respectively. Accumulation in the filter media layer was the predominant mechanism responsible for the reduction in P outflow loading (57% retention of TP inflow load) followed by plant uptake (21% TP retention). Of the P retained within the filter media layer, 48% occurred in stable, 41% in potentially mobilizable, and 11% in easily mobilizable forms. There were no signs that the P retention capacity of the bioretention cell would approach saturation in the near future. The design of this bioretention facility seems therefore especially efficient at controlling urban P runoff.
This Dataset includes the model scripts and modelled results dataset for Elm Drive bio retention cell.
Purpose
Plain Language Summary
Keywords
Urban bioretention cell |
Phosphorus |
Fate and transport |
Flow attenuation |
Retention |
Citations
Section 2: Research Site
Temporal Extent
Begin Date
|
End Date
|
2020-01-01
|
2022-10-03
|
Geographic Bounding Box
West Boundary Longitude
|
|
East Boundary Longitude
|
|
North Boundary Latitude
|
|
South Boundary Latitude
|
|
Is Boundary Rectangular
Research Site Images
Research Site Description (if needed)
Elm Drive bioretention cells, Missisuaga, Ontario
Basin
Subbasin
Specific Locations (if needed)
Elm Drive bioretention cells | 43.5885218 | -79.6336246 |
| | |
| | |
Research Site Location
Map Not Available
Display
View on Global Map
Section 3: Status and Provenance
Dataset Version
Dataset Creation Date
Status of data collection/production
Dataset Completion or Abandonment Date
Data Update Frequency
Creation Software
Primary Source of Data
Other Source of Data (if applicable)
Data Lineage (if applicable). Please include versions (e.g., input and forcing data, models, and coupling modules; instrument measurements; surveys; sample collections; etc.)
Section 4: Access and Downloads
Access to the Dataset
Terms of Use
Does the data have access restrictions?
Downloading and Characteristics of the Dataset
Download Links and Instructions
Total Size of all Dataset Files (GB)
File formats and online databases
Other Data Formats (if applicable)
List of Parameters and Variables