This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Master
List
Data
Centre
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Metadata Editor Record List Alias List Editor
Data Centre
Data Type Editor
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Oloye, F.F., Xie, Y.-Y., Challis, J. J.K., Femi-Oloye, P.P., Brinkmann, M., Mcphedran, K. N., Jones, P.D., Servos, M.R., Giesy., P.P.
Title
Understanding Common Population Markers for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Normalization in Wastewater - a Review
Year
2023
Publication Outlet
Chemosphere. 333:138682
DOI
HTTPS://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138682
Citation
Oloye, F.F., Xie, Y.-Y., Challis, J. J.K., Femi-Oloye, P.P., Brinkmann, M., Mcphedran, K. N., Jones, P.D., Servos, M.R., Giesy., P.P. (2023) Understanding Common Population Markers for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Normalization in Wastewater - a Review. Chemosphere. 333:138682. HTTPS://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138682
Abstract
Wastewater monitoring and epidemiology have seen renewed interest during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, there is an increasing need to normalize wastewater-derived viral loads in local populations. Chemical tracers, both exogenous and endogenous compounds, have proven to be more stable and reliable for normalization than biological indicators. However, differing instrumentation and extraction methods can make it difficult to compare results. This review examines current extraction and quantification methods for ten common population indicators: creatinine, coprostanol, nicotine, cotinine, sucralose, acesulfame, androstenedione 5-hydroindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), caffeine, and 1,7-dimethyluric acid. Some wastewater parameters such as ammonia, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and daily flowrate were also evaluated. The analytical methods included direct injection, dilute and shoot, liquid/liquid, and solid phase extraction (SPE). Creatine, acesulfame, nicotine, 5-HIAA and androstenedione have been analysed by direct injection into LC-MS; however, most authors prefer to include SPE steps to avoid matrix effects. Both LC-MS and GC-MS have been successfully used to quantify coprostanol in wastewater, and the other selected indicators have been quantified successfully with LC-MS. Acidification to stabilize the sample before freezing to maintain the integrity of samples has been reported to be beneficial. However, there are arguments both for and against working at acidic pHs. Wastewater parameters mentioned earlier are quick and easy to quantify, but the data does not always represent the human population effectively. A preference for population indicators originating solely from humans is apparent. This review summarises methods employed for chemical indicators in wastewater, provides a basis for choosing an appropriate extraction and analysis method, and highlights the utility of accurate chemical tracer data for wastewater-based epidemiology
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-NGS: Next Generation Solutions for Healthy Water Resources
Publication Stage
Published
Download Links
HTTPS://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138682
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-06-18
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2024-07-24-K2K1bkTpbpNUWOUSmfRe9T5w Publication 1.0