This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Bieniada, Aneta; Hug, Laura A.; Parsons, Christopher T.; Strack, Maria
Title
Methane Cycling Microbial Community Characteristics: Comparing Natural, Actively Extracted, Restored and Unrestored Boreal Peatlands
Year
2023
Publication Outlet
Wetlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01726-y
Citation
Bieniada, Aneta; Hug, Laura A.; Parsons, Christopher T.; Strack, Maria (2023) Methane Cycling Microbial Community Characteristics: Comparing Natural, Actively Extracted, Restored and Unrestored Boreal Peatlands, Wetlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01726-y
Abstract
The microbial community in peat is responsible for organic matter degradation and greenhouse gas emissions, yet its response to peat extraction and peatland restoration remains poorly understood. We investigated how different physicochemical conditions in natural, restored, unrestored, and actively extracted peatlands influenced the methanogenic and methanotrophic community characteristics. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing allowed for the comparison of the abundance of both groups. The communities were similar at sites restored in 1991 and 2009 (25 and 7 years prior to our research) that had high water table and were dominated by sedges. A different, shared pattern of microbial membership was observed at natural, unrestored, and actively extracted sites, and a site restored in 2012 (4 years prior to the research). These similarities were reflected in peat chemistry and hydrology in canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination that was used to investigate how these factors affected the abundances of methane cycling taxa. Based on the CCA, methanotrophs reached their highest abundances close to the water table, at high and moderate concentrations of phosphate and propionate, and low concentrations of formate. Methanogens exhibited a more distributed pattern, with organisms responding to opposite conditions along these environmental gradients. Methane-cycling community in older restored sites departed from the reference community at the natural bog likely due to the fen-like conditions that developed at these sites.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
GWFO: Global Water Futures Observatories
Download Links
10.1007/s13157-023-01726-y
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-09-12
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2026-09-15-S1JS2pMb6sBUCWChF2jFTd5w Publication 1.0